SONADHAN MARANDI Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ON repeated call, nobody appears on behalf of the Appellant to argue this case.

(2.) ON the request of the Court, Mr. Tapas Roy argued this case as Amicus Curie.

(3.) IT is submitted by the learned Counsel for the Appellants that appeal was admitted, but no bail was granted to the Appellant while admitting the appeal on 17.02.2003. Subsequently, the prayer for ball of the Appellant was refused on 02.04.2003. Thereafter, the Appellant remained in custody for more than seven years, as such, he has served the full sentence and the appeal has become infructuous and he may be released.