BALDEO RAUT Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Counsel for the parties.

(2.) The petitioner in this writ application has prayed for quashing the order dated 24.02.2004 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, S.P. Division, Dumka in R.M.A. No. 375/1986-87 whereby after disagreeing with the findings of Settlement Officer in his order dated 18.12.1986 passed in M.P. Case No. 43/1983, to the effect that the land covered by Jamabandi No. 13 of Mourya Sahjana recorded in the name of two widows was in fact Fouti and the appellants/private respondents herein, were not the heirs of the recorded tenants of the two widows, the Divisional Commissioner had allowed the appeal of the private respondents.

(3.) The admitted facts of the case is as follows: