AYODHYA PRASAD YADAV Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND,

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD .

(2.) PETITIONER is aggrieved by the order dated 9.8.2009, passed by the District Education Officer cum District Program Officer, Sarb Sikchha Abhiyan, Garhwa (Annexure -1), rejecting the petitioner's claim pursuant to the order passed on 2.2.2009 in WPC No. 6484 of 2007.

(3.) IT appears from the impugned order that both the schools were established simultaneously; and that Pathagara Kala being a bigger village the school situated at Pathagara Kala was to be upgraded, but by mistake both the schools at Pathagara Kala and Khurd were upgraded. It is further said in the impugned order that there is difference of only 0.5 kilometer between two schools and therefore decision was taken to close the school at Pathagara Khurd on 9.9.2006. Moreover, in the school of Pathagara Kala, the facility of toilet and drinking water were available, which were not available in the school at Pathagara Khurd.