DINESH PRASAD SINGH Vs. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:

(2.) In nutshell, the case of the Petitioner is that since he had been working as Assistant Fuel Technologist , therefore, he was entitled to be promoted as Fuel Technologist. In Para-30 of his petition, the Petitioner has quoted as follows:

(3.) This part of the pleadings ,now when put to the learned Counsel, falls on the ground that these things are not substantiated by any document. The only document relied in support of this assertion is Annexure-13, wherein an office note has been prepared to the effect that this is to be submitted to the DPC (Departmental Promotion Committee), which was never considered. Therefore, the claim of the Petitioner is also based on a misconception and false assertion in the writ petition.