TEJ NARAYAN ROY Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Opposite Parties.

(2.) The claim of the petitioner is that act of contempt has been committed by the Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 3, namely, the State Transport Commissioner, C.M.P.D.I. and the Secretary, Transport Department, C.M.P.D.I. for not promoting or considering the promotion of the petitioner to the Class III post from Class IV on which he is continuously working.

(3.) The extract of the order passed on 23 rd January, 2006 is quoted below: -