S D M KARAN Vs. TELCO COMPANY LTD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

(2.) It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the learned Tribunal has wrongly discussed the evidences and came to a wrong finding that the petitioner is not a workman and as such, the reference was bad and accordingly, the same was declared to be not maintainable.

(3.) It is submitted that since the Court has given conclusive finding in deciding point No. 1 that the petitioner is not a workman, in that view of the matter he has rightly stated that the reference was not maintainable under the Industrial Disputes Act can be raised by the workman and no other employees who are working as supervisory staffs.