LAWS(JHAR)-2010-1-27

PRADIP KUMAR MANDAL Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Decided On January 04, 2010
Pradip Kumar Mandal Appellant
V/S
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petition has been preferred mainly for getting an appointment as Para -Teacher with the respondent -State and the respondent -State has appointed respondent Nos. 6 and 7 as Para -Teachers, though they are not duly qualified. It is also submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the qualification, required for appointment as Para -Teacher in a Middle School, is Graduate whereas respondent Nos. 6 and 7 are not Graduates in any of the faculties and hence their appointment is illegal, in the eyes of law.

(2.) I have heard learned Counsel for the respondent -State, who has submitted that there is no illegality in the appointment of respondent Nos. 6 and 7 for the post of Para -Teacher, because they are appointed for Class I to V, for which the required qualification is Intermediate, which respondent Nos. 6 and 7 are already having. It is also submitted by the learned Counsel for the respondent -State that the present petitioner is not legally qualified to be appointed as Para -Teacher and there is no procedural lapses in the selection and appointment of respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and they have already been selected as Para -Teachers in the year, 2007 and they are also working as Para -Teachers in the concerned school, to the satisfaction of the respondent -State.

(3.) HAVING heard learned Counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that there is no substance in this writ petition, mainly for the following facts and reasons: