LAWS(PVC)-1906-2-43

KASARAM RANGIAH Vs. MALLA CHENGAMA NAIDU

Decided On February 15, 1906
KASARAM RANGIAH Appellant
V/S
MALLA CHENGAMA NAIDU Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE document is a bond and not a promissory note. Venku V/s. Sitaram (1904) I.L.R. 29 B. 82 It consequently can be admitted in evidence on payment of penalty and stamp duty under Section 35(a) of the Stamp Act. of some kind whether skilled or unskilled.