LAWS(PVC)-1925-11-75

TAMBI REDDI VIRAREDDY Vs. DEVI REDDY PATTABHIRAM REDDY

Decided On November 24, 1925
TAMBI REDDI VIRAREDDY Appellant
V/S
DEVI REDDY PATTABHIRAM REDDY Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The plaintiffs who are respondents Nos. 1 and 2 herein arrested the 2nd defendant, the 3 respondent herein, in execution of a money-decree. The appellant executed a security bond on 11 December 1923 undertaking to produce and hand over the 2nd defendant whenever the Court passed an order to produce him. The bond also provided that in default of the surety producing the second defendant and handing him over to the Court, the amount of decree interest, and costs shall be recovered by the plaintiffs from the surety personally. On the execution of the bond, the second defendant was released from arrest. The plaintiffs applied to the lower Court for an order that the surety be directed to produce the second defendant and in default of producing him, the decree amount be realised from him. The appellant contended that the decree of the plaintiffs against the second defendant had been satisfied and that no execution could issue against him in execution of a decree already satisfied. The District Judge overruled the objection of the appellant and directed him to produce the second defendant on or before a certain date and on his failure to do so that execution should issue against him. The appellant has preferred this civil miscellaneous appeal.

(2.) Two points arise for consideration in this case one of fact and the other of law.

(3.) The first point is whether the decree has been satisfied. Mr. Somayya for the appellant relies very strongly upon Ex. II which is the defendant's ledger, in the account book of plaintiffs. From the entries in the ledger, it is found that a nil balance is struck. And Mr. Somayya's contention is that the decree debt has been wiped off by payment. There are entries on both sides of the ledger and the balance is zero. In Ex. III, the ledger of the 3 defendant, there is a debit entry of Rs. 5,000. It is argued for the appellant that the 3 defendant paid Rs. 5,000 in discharge of the decree-debt and thereby the decree-debt has been fully satisfied.