(1.) This is an appeal against the order of the Subordinate Judge of Masulipatam on C.M.P. No. 1249 of 1922.
(2.) In O.S. No. 45 of 1920, the plaintiffs-minors appeared by their next friend and he exonerated the 1 defendant. The minors now apply to have the matter re- opened. No one appears for first defendant.
(3.) The point for determination is whether the learned Judge's concluding remark as justified: Even if it be held that my predecessor ought to have made some enquiry before allowing the next friend to give up 1 defendant, I think as a successor I cannot re-open the suit.