LAWS(PVC)-1924-11-31

ARSHED ALI Vs. EMPEROR

Decided On November 25, 1924
ARSHED ALI Appellant
V/S
EMPEROR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Arshed Ali has been found guilty by the unanimous verdict of the Jury on the charge of abetment of murder. He has been sentenced by the Additional Sessions Judge of Backerganj to death under Section 302 read with Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code. Under Section 374 of the Or. P.C. the proceedings have been submitted to this Court for confirmation and the accused has also preferred an appeal against his conviction.

(2.) The facts according to the case for the prosecution are as follows: Lalsom Bibi, the principal witness in this case, has lived as the wife of five men. To how many of them she was legally married is not clear, but her marriage to the appellant Arshed Ali who was the fourth of her so-called husbands was certainly bigamous as it took place during the lifetime of the third Abdul Hussain who had not divorced her. After living with the appellant for a few months she left him and went to live in her father's bari. She was then one month pregnant. In Magh last she went through a form of nika marriage with the deceased Sher Ali. This enraged Arshed Ali and twice in the months of Falgoon and Chaitra, Jabed Ali who is Arshed Ali's dharma-bhai asked Lalsom to return to Arshed Ali anc threatened her when she refused to do so On the night of the 10 April (28 Chaitra) Sher Ali, Lalsom and her three children were sleeping in her hut. At a little before midnight Lalsom woke up hearing the noise of a scuffle. She heard Jabed Ali, whose voice she recognised, say "Let me go." She got up to light a lamp and then heard Arshed Ali saying "Jabed Ali, is the deed done." By the light of the lamp she saw that Sher Ali's viscera were protruding from a wound in his stomach and another wound on the left side of his chest. Her cries brought several neighbours to the scene and both Sher Ali and Lalsom told them that they had recognised Jabed Ali and Arshed Ali by their voices.

(3.) Sher Ali was taken by boat to Patuakhali, the Sub Divisional headquarter, where he arrived at, about 11 A. M. He was taken to the hospital and there his statement was recorded by an Honorary Magistrate from 3.30 to 4.10 p.m. He said that he had been wounded by Jabed Ali and Arshed Ali and that Jabed Ali inflicted the wound "with a dao. He also stated that he was wounded because he married Arshed Ali's wife. He died before sunset that afternoon. The doctor who held the post mortem examination found three incised wounds on the body, of which two were homicidal. In his opinion death was due to shock and haemorrhage from these two wounds.