LAWS(PVC)-1912-8-63

BALUSU LAKSHMAYYA Vs. EMPEROR

Decided On August 22, 1912
BALUSU LAKSHMAYYA Appellant
V/S
EMPEROR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE judgment of the Deputy Magistrate does not comply with the requirements of Section 367, Criminal Procedure Code. THEre is a long recital of the facts preceding the alleged offence, but no discussion of the evidence or anything to indicate that the Magistrate has considered such essential points as the ownership of the grain, the possibility of accused having acted in good faith, or the evidence implicating individual accused persons. THE order of the Deputy Magistrate confirming the convictions and sentences is set aside; and he is directed to re-hear the appeal and dispose of it according to law. THE accused, who has been admitted to bail by this Court, will remain on the same bail pending disposal of the appeal by the Deputy Magistrate.