LAWS(PVC)-1910-5-39

EMPEROR Vs. MALU HIRU BAGARA

Decided On May 06, 1910
EMPEROR Appellant
V/S
MALU HIRU BAGARA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) We think that this appeal must be allowed.

(2.) The facts stated are that the accused was sitting in a Bhoja or a specially prepared screen devised for hunting and had by his side a loaded gun, and that he was so sitting there with the intention of hunting.

(3.) Upon those facts we have no doubt that the accused was hunting within the meaning of Section 25, Clause (i) of the Indian Forest Act where the word "hunt" is used intransitively and in that use the meaning ascribed to it in Murray's Dictionary is to go in pursuit of wild animals, to engage in the chase." A similar interpretation is adopted in Webster's Dictionary, and it appears to us that in the ordinary use of the English language the accused on the facts before us was hunting.