LAWS(PVC)-1910-3-157

MULINTI VIRANA GOWD Vs. DTIMMA REDDI

Decided On March 21, 1910
MULINTI VIRANA GOWD Appellant
V/S
DTIMMA REDDI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WE are not satisfied that there was a subsisting attachment when the defendant purchased. The plaintiff has failed to produce the order of the former Munsif giving reasons for striking off the petition. WE cannot hold that an order striking off a petition is always to be understood as having been made only for statistical purposes.

(2.) WE dismiss the second appeal with costs.