(1.) THE only question argued in second appeal is about the validity of the melcharth. THE plaintiffs are clearly barred from disputing it, as defendants Nos. 2 to 19 have been in receipt of rents as melcharthdars for more than 12 years. THE ruling in Madhava V/s. Narayana 9 M. 244, is a clear authority in the defendants favour.
(2.) THE second appeal is dismissed with costs.