(1.) BOTH the appellants are in second round of litigation before the Tribunal. Tribunal in the earlier occasion by final order dated 17.01.2002 reported in : 2004 (165) E.L.T. 74 (Tri. Del.) ordered that there was shortage of 4,116 locks of Harrison Brand but assessable value thereof re -determined in terms of the decision of the Larger Bench in the case of Srichakra Tyres Ltd. vs. Collector of Central Excise, Madras reported in : 1999 (108) E.L.T. 361 (Tri.). Secondly, it was ordered that the issue of duty on the basis of job charges paid by the appellant was to be re -examined. Thirdly, there shall be re -examination of the issue of shortage of raw material and fourthly the duty demand of Rs. 2,16,938/ - on account of locks seized from the premises of M/s. R.P. Locks is to be re -examined for passing fresh order. Matter was remanded accordingly for Renovo adjudication granting cum -duty benefit.
(2.) SHORTAGE of raw material alleged to be used in manufacture of clandestinely cleared goods.
(3.) KEY locks found in the premises of M/s. R.P. Locks.