(1.) THE appellants are aggrieved by the demand of differential duty, confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty on the allegation that appellants evaded duty by mis -declaring the RSP and selling the goods imported at a higher price than the RSP declared at the time of import.
(2.) THE contentions raised on behalf of the appellants can be summarized as under:
(3.) CONTROVERTING the above submissions, the arguments advanced by the Ld. DR can be summarized as under: