(1.) THIS case was posted for hearing of the stay application but the point of law being settled, the appeal was taken up for hearing on granting waiver of deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 67,604 and penalty of Rs. 19,500.
(2.) ON considering the case of the appellant before him on the stay application, the Commissioner (Appeals) passed Order dated 24.12.98. The appellants deposited Rs. 34,000 as a pre -condition to hearing of their appeal. He did not hear the appellants drawing strength from the Gujarat High Court judgment in the case of DCW v. CCE 1998 (97) ELT 424. The appellants did not comply with the order and their appeal was dismissed in terms of section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Hence, the present appeal.
(3.) IN a number of decisions , Entek IRD International], the Tribunal had in such circumstances held that the Commissioner was required to give a chance to the assessees to be heard before dismissing the appeal before him. The Gujarat High Court also in their judgment in the case of Ricoh India Ltd. in which a reference was made to DCW judgment relied upon by the Commissioner in 1999 (34) RLT 231, had stressed the need for granting of personal hearing before disposal of stay application.