LAWS(TLNG)-2023-12-39

M. HANUMANTHA SRAVAN Vs. STATE OF TELANGANA

Decided On December 01, 2023
M. Hanumantha Sravan Appellant
V/S
State of Telangana Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This writ petition is filed praying this Court to declare the action of respondent No.3 in summoning the petitioners to the police inspite of giving explanation to the notice issued under Sec. 41-A of Cr.P.C. in Crime No.119 of 2023, as illegal and arbitrary.

(2.) The case of the petitioners is that respondent No.5 entered into a lease agreement with the petitioners, dtd. 13/4/2022 for the Flat Nos.504, 505 and 506 admeasuring 1225 square feet, terrace and rooms located in Chandralok Complex, Paradise, Secunderabad. As per the terms and conditions of the lease agreement, dtd. 13/4/2022, the lease period is for five years and respondent No.5 has to pay Rs.17,000.00 per month towards rent and maintenance etc. and the rent is to be enhanced at 10% of the agreed rent for the first year and thereafter 12%. There are disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.5, which necessiated the petitioners to file a suit vide O.S.No.662 of 2023 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad. During the pendency of the said suit, respondent No.4 filed W.P.No.16518 of 2023 before this Court. Thereafter, the respondents-police, acting upon the complaint submitted by respondent No.5, registered a case in Crime No.119 of 2023 and issued a notice as required under Sec. 41-A of Cr.P.C. It is the further case of the petitioners that soon after receipt of the said notice they have submitted an explanation stating all the relevant facts. The grievance of the petitioners is that even after registration of the crime, submission of the explanation and during the pendency of O.S.No.662 of 2023, at the instance of respondent Nos.4 to 6, respondent No.3 is frequently summoning them to the police station, forcing them to enter into a settlement as per the terms dictated by them.

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that respondent No.3 is not having any power or authority to intervene into the civil disputes pending adjudication of O.S.No.662 of 2023 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad and the action of respondent No.3 in interfering into the civil disputes or summoning the petitioners to the police station, confining them for hours together and forcing them to enter into a settlement amounts to violation of the rights guaranteed under Articles 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and respondent No.3 is not only liable for prosecution and also liable for payment of compensation for his illegal interference in the civil disputes/civil rights of the petitioners.