LAWS(TLNG)-2021-6-8

MANSOOR SHAH KHAN Vs. STATE OF TELANGANA

Decided On June 01, 2021
Mansoor Shah Khan Appellant
V/S
State of Telangana Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in opening Rowdy Sheet Nos.1284, 1285, 1286 and 1287/RS/ACP-BH/2019 dated 11.12.2019 and continuing the same against the petitioners as illegal and for a consequential direction to the respondents to close the rowdy sheets against the petitioners and not to call them to the police station.

(2.) There are four petitioners in the present writ petition. According to them, they were involved in two cases i.e. Crime No.331 of 2015 pending on the file of Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad for the offences under Sections 447, 427 and 506 read with 34 IPC. The police, after completion of investigation, filed a charge sheet against the petitioners herein for the aforesaid offences and the same was taken on file vide C.C.No.650 of 2017. The said proceedings in C.C.No.650 of 2017 ended in acquittal vide judgment dated 22.02.2018 passed by the learned II Special Magistrate, Hyderabad.

(3.) Ms. Vladimeer Khatoon, learned counsel for the petitioners, referring to the said proceedings, would submit that proceedings in C.C.No.650 of 2017 (arising out of Crime No.331 of 2015) ended in acquittal by the learned Special Magistrate Court, Hyderabad. The said judgment attained finality. The petitioners herein are also accused in P.R.C.No.307 of 2020 (arising out of Crime No.926 of 2019) for the offences under Sections 307, 448, 147, 148, 506 read with 149 of IPC, which is pending. As on today, there is only one case pending against the petitioners herein. However, without considering the said fact and also the procedure laid down under the A.P.Police Manual, the respondents have issued the above said rowdy sheets against the petitioners herein and they are continuing the same which is arbitrary, illegal and also contrary to the principles laid down by the Hon 'ble Apex Court and this Court in catena of decisions. Learned counsel would further submit that under the guise of opening and continuation of rowdy sheets, the respondents/police are calling the petitioners to the police station and harassing them by making them to wait in the police station for hours together. With the said submissions, learned counsel for the petitioners sought a direction to the respondents to close the above said rowdy sheets opened against the petitioners on 11.12.2019. She has relied on the principles laid down by this Court in the judgments in WP.No.12845 of 2014 dated 27.09.2019 and W.P.No.15050 of 2020 dated 03.11.2020.