LAWS(TLNG)-2020-4-15

VENKATA SRIRAMAM KONDURI Vs. GEETA SIVA TEJASWI TEEGAVARAPU

Decided On April 29, 2020
Venkata Sriramam Konduri Appellant
V/S
Geeta Siva Tejaswi Teegavarapu Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The appellants have challenged the legality of the order dated 22.08.2019, passed by the Judge, Family Court, L.B. Nagar, R. R. District in I.A. No. 1336 of 2019 in G.W.O.P. No. 28 of 2019. By the said order, the learned Family Court has rejected the application filed by the appellants under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. seeking dismissal of the plaint filed by the respondent, Smt. Geeta Siva Tejaswi Teegavarapu, wherein the respondent had sought the custody of her minor child, Master Venkata Ashrit under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 ('the Act' for short). Briefly, the facts of the case are that in 2006, the appellant No. 1, Mr. Venkata Sriramam Konduri went, and settled in the United States of America. The appellant No. 1 and the respondent got married on 08.02.2014 at Ahobila Mutt, Tirumala, Andhra Pradesh in accordance with the Hindu rites and customs. After the marriage, on 10.04.2014, both the appellant No. 1 and the respondent moved to United States. The couple resided at 3103, Stone Water, Glen L N Cary, NC 27519. During their stay, and during their wedlock, on 28.05.2018, a son, Venkata Ashrit was born at the Duke Medical Centre, North Carolina. Since the child was born in the United States, he became a United States citizen by naturalization.

(2.) However, after the birth of the son, for reasons best known to the parties, certain disputes erupted between the appellant No. 1 and the respondent. Apprehending that the respondent may remove the child from his custody, on 15.10.2018, the appellant No. 1 initiated a child custody proceeding before the District Court, County of Wake, North Carolina, U.S.A. By order dated 15.10.2018, the learned District Court granted a temporary emergency, and exclusive legal and physical custody of the minor child to the appellant No.1. The learned District Court further directed that the minor child should not be removed by either party from the County of Wake pending hearing. As the differences continued to mount between the appellant No.1 and the respondent, on 21.10.2018, the respondent left United States along with her mother while leaving the minor child in the appellants' care.

(3.) According to the appellants, since the minor child had to undergo the tonsure ceremony, on 19.03.2019, the child was sent to India along with his parental grandmother, Mrs. Konduri Naga Maheshwari, the appellant No. 3 before this Court.