GAJJU RAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS matter was listed at serial no. 70 of the today's cause list. It was mentioned at 2. 00 p. m. by learned counsel Shri Kalla that while admitting this petition the learned Vacation Judge of this Court restricted the interim relief till today, therefore, the same may be extended as the notice issued against the respondents has not yet returned served or un-served. From the record of the case, I found that there was an application filed by one Jai Singh, up-Sarpanch, who is holding the charge of the post of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat filed by learned counsel Shri G. R. Punia for impleading him as a party respondent in the writ petition.

(2.) CONSIDERING the serious averments made in the application to be impleaded as party respondents, learned counsel Shri Anand Purohit was directed to accept notice and Mr. Kalla was asked to argue the matter. Initially, he was little bit hesitant in arguing the matter and he insisted to adjourn the case, which request was refused by me and thereafter, he has fully argued the matter and raised contentions which have been raised in this petition itself.