REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Banshi Lal Nayati Appellant

V/S

STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

GYAN SINGH MOAN V. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND ANR. [REFERRED TO]
KAILASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL V. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
BAINKUNTHNATH DAS AND ANR. V. CHIEF DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER,BERIPADA AND ANR. [REFERRED TO]
P AND T BOARD AND ORS. V. C.S.N. MURTI [REFERRED TO]
I.K. MISRA V. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
SATYA PRAKASH GUPTA V. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. COLLECTOR J N SINHA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. M E REDDY [REFERRED TO]
C D AILAWADI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. V P SETH ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
S RAMACHANDRARAJU VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. BIHARI LAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. ABHAI KISHORE MASTA [REFERRED TO]
CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA BHUBANESWAR VS. SURESHCHANDRA BEHERA [REFERRED TO]
K KANDASWAMY VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
H G VENKATACHALIAH SETTY VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
NARASINGH PATNAIK VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VS. K C GAMBHIR [REFERRED TO]
S A ENGINEER VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. GURDAS SINGH [REFERRED TO]
M S BINDRA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GUJARAT VS. SURYAKANT CHUNILAL SHAH [REFERRED TO]
MADAN MOHAN CHOUDHARY VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BOTH these petitions have been filed in respect of the judgment and order dated 13.3.1990 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, by which the order dated 9.4.1985, passed by the District Collector, Chittorgarh, giving compulsory retirement to petitioner - employee Banshi Lal Nayati has been quashed. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2565/1991 has been filed by petitioner -employee for seeking direction to implement the said judgment and order, while S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3877/1991 has been filed by the State for setting aside the said judgment.

(2.) THE facts and circumstances giving rise to these cases are that petitioner Banshi Lal Nayati entered in the service of the respondents as Patwari on 2.7.1951. He had been given compulsory retirement vide impugned order dated 9.4.1985 (Annexure. 1) in exercise of the powers conferred under Rule 244(2) of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 (for short, 'the Rules'). Being aggrieved and dissatisfied, he prepared an appeal before the Tribunal, which has been allowed by the judgment and order dated 13.3.1990 mainly on the following grounds -

(3.) HEARD Mr. Sajjan Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner -employee and Mr. R.K. Soni and Mr. M.R. Singhvi, for the respondents.

Click here to view full judgment.

BANSHI LAL NAYATI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address