GIRDHARI LAL Vs. KANTA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE defendant-appellant seeks to challenge the judgment and decree dated 23. 11. 98 of learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Sikar whereby the Civil Regular First Appeal preferred by defendant-appellant was dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 10. 10. 1994 of learned Additional Civil Judge (Lower Division) No. 1 Sikar passed in a suit for eviction was confirmed.

(2.) THE parties shall be referred herein after in the manner as they were arrayed in the suit.

(3.) SECTION 14 (2) of the Rent Act mandates the court to consider whether the eviction of tenant from part of premises is to be ordered so as to substantially satisfy reasonable requirement of landlord. Undoubtedly, even in the absence of specific pleading, the court has to act in compliance of the mandate and give a finding. This is what their lordships of Supreme Court have propounded in the case of Rahmand Jeo Wangnoo (supra ).