ANIL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Smt. Juli and the applicant Anil Kumar entered into wedlock about 2 years back. Disputes arose between them but such disputes were sorted-out in the presence of higher authorities. It appears that though their disputes were stated to have been settled yet they could not improve their inter se relations. The applicant, therefore, filed a petition under Sec. 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act on 9.7.98. The notice of the petitioner was served upon Smt. Juli in the month of Sept., 1998. Thereafter, Smt. Juli filed a complaint against the applicant for offence under Sec. 498-A and 406 Penal Code on 24.12.98. It further appears that on 28.9.98 certain articles, belong to Smt. Juli, were also returned by the applicant in presence of police officers.

(2.) Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case it is directed that the applicant Anil S/o Harish Chandra in the event of his arrest, in FIR No. 839/98, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Alwar, shall be released on bail on his furnishing two sureties in the amount of Rs. 5000.00 with personal bond in the amount of Rs. 10000.00 to the satisfaction of the Officer arresting him and shall observe the following conditions :

(3.) This order shall remain in force till the expiry of one month after the submissions of the charge sheet, if any, against him/her/them during the meanwhile the applicant(s) may appear before the court concerned and pray for regular bail there.