HEMA RAM Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE AJMER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ADMIT.

(2.) ISSUE notice to the respondents. Learned standing counsel Mr. Mehta for the respondent Revenue Department is directed to accept the notice for the respondents. Mr. Jakhar to supply a copy of the petition.

(3.) IT is the case of the present petitioners that at the time of death of Malar, only 322 bighas land was in Khatedari and not 608. 5 bighas and 66 bighas of land bearing Khasra Nos. 239 and 214 respectively were sold by Malar in his life time in the year 1967 which was entered in the name of purchasers as khatedars in the revenue record but without considering the said revenue record, the Collector wrongly entered those Khasra numbers in his order dated 31. 10. 90 and the Board of Revenue also without perusing the record accepted the reference in toto and entered the Khasra No. 239 also in its order dated 19. 6. 97. As per the order of the Board of Revenue, the mutation No. 20 was sanctioned of 56 bighas 12 biswas out of 66 bighas land bearing Khasra No. 239 which was in the Khatedari rights of the petitioners (Annex. 8 ).