KAILASH RAM Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a fifth bail application wherein learned Sr. Advocate Mr. M. D. Purohit tried to submit on merits which is not permissible because all the arguments which were tried to be argued today have been argued previously and were not found favour by the Court and, therefore, earlier bail applications were rejected either as withdrawn or as it is.

(2.) LEARNED counsel Mr. Purohit then submitted that the prosecution is adopting delayed tactics in examining the witnesses. He submitted that instead of examining important eye witnesses, they are examining witnesses who are absolutely formal. It is the discretion of the prosecution and the learned Public Prosecutor has to decide who should be examined first. The fact which is not in dispute is that the prosecution is examining the witnesses and the trial is going on.