MOHAN LAL PUROHIT Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Only one contention was raised in this petition by learned counsel Mr. R. K. Soni for the petitioner namely, that the respondents have wrongly calculated the vacancies and not properly applied reservation.

(2.) Before dealing with this submission, few material facts are required to be stated which are as under :-

(3.) It is clear that the respondents were required to first filled up 3 vacant seats belonging to S.C. and S.T. category, out of which 1 seat was already filled up under the orders of this Court and 2 remaining seats were required to be filled up from S.C. quota and accordingly, they had filled up the same. Merely because the petitioner was first in the waiting list that would not entitle him to get admission against the S.C. or S.T. quota.