GIRJA DEVI Vs. DIRECTOR SANSKRIT EDUCATION RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SINCE question of facts and law involve in both these writ petitions are identical in nature, they were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order.

(2.) THE services of both these petitioners were terminated by the respondent No. 2 Nehru Shiksha Bharti Samiti, Bharatpur and the legality of termination order has been called in question by them in the instant writ petitions.

(3.) AS already stated while referring Sec. 21 of the Act of 1989 that any dispute of the nature preferred in sub-sec. (1) pending before the State Government or any officer of the State Government immediately before the commencement of the Act of 1989 shall be transferred to the Tribunal for its decision. The disputes raised by the petitioners in the instant writ petitions are covered under Sub-Sec. (1) of Sec. 21 of the Act of 1989. Therefore, I am of the considered view that the instant writ petitions may be transferred for adjudication before the Tribunal and such directions can be issued by this Court u/art. 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India.