(1.) THIS revision petition has been filed against the order of the learned District Judge, Pali dated May 10,. 1988 by which he dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner on the ground of limitation.
(2.) IT has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the judgment against which appeal was filed was delivered on February 7, 1987, application for obtaining a certified copy of the judgement was moved on February 10, 1987, February 11, 1987 was fixed for delivery of the certified copy, it was ready on February 19, 1987, it was delivered on February 21, l987 another application for obtaining a certified copy of the decree was moved on March 3, 1987, it was delivered on March 6, 1987, appeal was filed on March 24, 1987 and the appeal was perfectly within limitation as the time required in obtaining the certified copies have to be excluded.
(3.) CONSEQUENTLY, the revision petition is allowed and the order of the learned District Judge, Pali dated May 10, 1988 is set aside. The appeal will be decided in accordance with law. The parties will appear before the District, Judge, Pali on 8. 9. 89. .