VIKRAM SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

(2.) IT has been contended by Mr. Garg that the learned Sessions Judge while passing the impugned order did not consider the matter in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 228, Cr.P.C. and has passed a very brief order mentioning nothing about evidence and the accusation so also the reason as to how the petitioner can be charged under Section 307, IPC and Section 326, IPC.