(1.) THE petitioner has been convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bharatpur by order dated 3. 1. 83 for the offence under Section 3/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and sentenced to one year's R. I. and a fine of Rs. 2,000/ -. This conviction and sentence has been confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Bharatpur by the order dated 10th July, 1985. Against this, the present revision petition has been preferred.
(2.) THE question which has been mainly contended in this revision petition is that several over writings have been made in the complaint, in the written report submitted for the purpose of obtaining sanction for prosecution, and other documents. On basis of this it has been contended that the correct material was not placed before the sanctioning authority for obtaining the sanction and the sanction has been given on basis of some other sample and report.