UDAI SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of the Constitution of Panchayat on the ground that a part of a village was included in it in addition to two whole village which is not warranted by Section 3(1) of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act. Section 3(1) runs as follows: The State Government may by notification in the official gazette establish a panchayat for a village or a part of a village or a group of villages not included within the limits of a Municipality.

(2.) UNDER Section 3(1) a Panchayat may be established for a whole village or for a group of whole villages or for a part of one village. The intention is that if the village is a big one two Panchayats may be established for it. But there is no provision for including a part of a village in a PancK -ayat in which other whole villages are included, village Chandrai was not :j a village within the meaning of Section 2(14) of the Act. 'Village' is defined in this sub -section as a local area recorded as a village in the revenue records of the district in which it is situated Chandrai was part of village Nimbi Jodha till a notification was published in the Rajasthan Gazette dated 25 -1 -68 during the pendency of the present writ petition declaring it to be a revenue village.

(3.) IN the circumstances of the case, I leave the parties to bear their own costs of this writ petition.