SURAJMAL Vs. CHANDMAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision application by the vendors against an order of the Civil Judge, Jaipur City, holding that the agreement Ex. A/6 dated 14-5-56 is compulsory registrable and is inadmissible in evidence for want of registration.

(2.) THE material facts are these. THE applicants sold a portion of their house by means of a sale-deed executed on 2-5-56 and registered on 14-6-56. It was presented for registration on 14 5-56. Respondent No. 1 filed the present suit for pre-emption on 18-4-57. THE applicants filed an agreement Ex. A/6 dated 14-5-56 under which the vendees respondents No. 2 and 3 agreed to reconvey the property. THEy also filed a registered sale-deed 25-3-57 under which the property was recon-veyed by respondents No. 2 and 3 to the applicants.