PANNALAL Vs. MANAKLAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision application by Pannalal defendant No. 3, against an order of the Civil Judge, Bikaner, holding that the additional written statement filed by him should have been confined to the amended portion of the plaint only.

(2.) THE case of the plaintiffs is that they let out a shop to Nemichand, defendant No. 1, and that the latter sub-let it to his nephews defendant No. 2 and 3, who are now carrying on business in the shop. THE suit was instituted in 1965 for the ejectment of all the 3 defendants from the shop.

(3.) IN the circumstances of the case, I leave the parties to bear their own costs of this revision application. .