JAGANNATH Vs. GHISALAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision has been filed against the appellate order of the Additional Collector, Kota dated 31. 7. 58 upholding the original order of the Tehsildar Ladpura dated 23. 6. 57 in a mutation case.

(2.) WE have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record as well A short and simple point is involved for determination in this case. The vendor belongs to a scheduled caste and the vendees who are the applicants before us do not belong to the scheduled castes. The applicants purchased the tenancy rights of the vendor and applied for mutation which was, however, rejected by the Tehsildar as being repugnant to the provisions contained in sec. 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, The first appellate court upheld this decision.