RAMESH CHANDRA Vs. ANOKH BAI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision which has been wrongly described as an appeal has been filed against the appellate order of the additional Collector, Kota, upholding the original order of the Tehsildar, whereby the Land Records Inspector was directed to eject the applicant from the land in dispute.

(2.) WE have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record as well. The facts of the case have been set out at length in the judgment of the learned Additional Collector. In mutation proceedings that were commenced upon the demise of Ramdhan, an issue of the adoption of the applicant was referred to a Civil Court and the same Was decided in favour of the opposite party. On receipt of this finding from the Civil Court the mutation was decided in favour of the opposite party. Thereafter the opposite party applied to the Tehsildar that as she was not in possession of the land in dispute the applicant should be ejected from the land and possession should be delivered to her The Tehsildar granted this application and directed the Land Records Inspector to dispossess the applicant. The applicant went up in appeal before the learned Additional Collector but met with no success and hence (his revision.