LAWS(RAJ)-1959-8-14

MESSERS BALA BUX AMARCHAND Vs. STATE GOVERNMENT

Decided On August 19, 1959
MESSERS BALA BUX AMARCHAND Appellant
V/S
STATE GOVERNMENT Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an application made within one year from the date of the payment for revision of a penalty under sec. 45 of the Indian Stamp Act.

(2.) WE have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record. The relevant facts of the case are not much in dispute. Balabux Amarchand applicants executed a mortgage deed without possession in favour of the former Ajmer State Government on a nonjudicial stamp of Re. 1/- only and the same was registered by the Sub-Registrar, Ajmer on 24. 7. 54. It appears that subsequent to the registration the Sub-Registrar served a notice upon the applicants oh 11. 10. 54 to show cause as to why a penalty in respect of deficient stamp duty be not charged from them in respect of the aforesaid mortgage deed. It does not appear from the record as to whether any objections were raised by the applicants or not before the Sub-Registrar and if so with what effect. The Sub-Registrar, however, "impounded" the document and forwarded the same to the Collector under S. 38 (2) of the Indian Stamp Act for necessary action. The Collector by his order dated 15. 1. 55 held that there was a deficiency of Rs. 596/8/-in the stamp duty inasmuch as the mortgage being for Rs. 1,19,041 should have been on a stamp p»per of Rs. 597/8/- and as it was written on 1 rupee stamp only the deficiency of Rs. 596/8/-along with an equal amount as penalty should be paid by the applicants. This order was passed by the back of the applicants and hence they applied to the Collector for a review of the same. This review petition was rejected on 25. 4. 55 on the ground that the law provided no review. The applicants thereafter paid the entire amount of deficiency and penalty on 27. 5. 55 and applied for its refund on 15. 7. 55. Before any final decision could be taken in the matter the State of Ajmer merged with that of Rajasthan and hence this case has come to the Board which is the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority for the State under the Indian Stamp Act.