RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioners have preferred this writ petition claiming the following reliefs:-

(2.) The petitioners are aggrieved by the order culminating out of disciplinary proceedings under Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeals) Rules, 1958.

(3.) The brief facts as noticed are that work for operation and maintenance of RUIDP Intakewell CPH, 33 KV GSS, 64 MLD WTP Plant Unit IIIrd at Akelgarh Kota was to be done for which a tender notice No.31/2013-14 was invited. The three Companies which submitted their tender work; M/s. K.K. Construction Company, M/s. Dynamic Intact Power Private Limited and M/s. Karuna Enterprises. M/s. Karuna Enterprises could not participate in the tender because in the tender condition it was not falling within the parameter of the tender value but the other two companies participated and M/s. K.K. Construction Company was given the work. Since the work could not be completed, the respondents intimated M/s. Dynamic Intact Power Private Limited to complete the work under the same terms and conditions which were already operating in the contract. The petitioners thereafter, allotted the work to Ms. Karuna Enterprises which agreed to complete the remaining work as per rates and conditions of the main work order of M/s. K.K. Construction.