MANAV KALYAN Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:

(2.) Mr. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that despite series of directions given by this Court, firstly by coordinate Bench and, thereafter, by Division Bench, the respondents have not conducted inspection, within time. Even the order of rejection came to be passed as late as on 14.11.2018, by which time, the petitioner's right to file scheme/ application, even for the Academic Session 2019-20, has since passed.Taking the Court through towards the interim order(s) passed by this Court, Mr. Mathur contended that the respondents nos.1 and 2 Union of India be directed to conduct the inspection and petitioner be permitted to take part in the ensuing counseling. Learned counsel raised a grievance that petitioner's representation/application dated 13.8.2019, wherein the petitioner-institution had requested the respondent CCIM to issue NOC, went unattended.

(3.) After hearing learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the material on record, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner's application for grant of NOC having been turned down by the respondent no.1, vide its order/communication dated 14.11.2018, no right of consideration, much less right of getting permission or even inspection subsists.