CHOTULAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Appellant has filed this appeal challenging the judgment/order of the trial Court dated 16.12.2016, whereby, he was convicted and sentenced qua offence punishable under Sections 302 , 307 , 324 , 341 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and Section 4 / 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').

(2.) Charges were framed against the appellant under Sections 302 , 307 , 341 IPC and Section 4 / 25 of the Act. Appellant did not plead guilty and claimed trial.

(3.) Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has been falsely involved in this case. In-fact, appellant was engaged to Santosh about two years prior to the incident. Santosh had visited the appellant in his house. Complainant and his wife did not approve of the same. Due to this reason, appellant has been falsely involved in this case, Assuming that the appellant had inflicted injuries to Santosh as well as Mamta, at the most, it could be said to be a case falling under Section 304 Part 1 IPC.