ANITA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The grievance raised and questions involved in these three writ petitions are common, hence they are being decided conjointly. All the above mentioned petitioners were selected against the vacancies advertised for Safai Employees, but subsequently appointment orders issued to the petitioners of the first writ petition (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16572/2018) have been canceled, whereas petitioners involved in the other two writ petitions (D.B. Civil Writ Petitions No.13489/2018 and 3475/2019), despite being selected, were not allowed to join duties. The reason for their rejection or denial is that they are having more than two children.

(2.) The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition invoking this Court's extra ordinary jurisdiction conferred by Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:-

(3.) The factual matrix within the precincts of the question raised and challenge laid in the instant writ petitions unfolds as under:-