SUMAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Mr. Ganesh Meena appears for respondents. Hence, service is complete. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being disposed of today itself.

(2.) By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the controversy raised, in the instant writ application, stands resolved in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Smt. Anju Meena v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. S.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 2226 of 2014; holding thus Issue notice. Copies of the writ petitions have been supplied to Shri S.K. Gupta, Additional Advocate General for the State. All these writ petitions have been filed by petitioners working on the post of Teacher Grade-II, Teacher Grade-III and Headmasters, contending that their posting as per instructions of the Government ought to be made as far as possible in the district of their choice on the basis of their merit position. Petitioners have in this connection relied on Circular dated 11/09/2013 issued by the Principal Secretary to Government in its Department of School Education in respect of the Head Masters selected for appointment through Rajasthan Public Service Commission and another Circular dated 03/08/2012 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary of the Government for Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department in respect of Teachers Gr.II and Gr.III selected for appointment in Primary and Upper Primary Schools of the State.