SHIV KUMAR GUPTA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner by way of this writ petition prays for stepping of his salary equivalent to that of one Ramkishore Maheshwari as it his contention that Ramkishore Maheshwari who is admittedly junior to the petitioner as a Lecturer, was receiving higher pay.

(2.) A look at the service book of the petitioner on the other hand shows that he retired on 28.02.2009 and on that day he was drawing Rs.24,960/- in the grade pay of Rs.6000/- while the respondent No.5 was in the grade pay of Rs.5,400/- as on 01.07.2008 with total gross pay of Rs.28,050/- thus after the revision done by the respondents, it is noticed that the petitioner is drawing higher pay and salary and grade pay vis a vis the respondent No.5.

(3.) In view of the aforesaid position which has come on record no further case for stepping up of pay or pension is made out. Accordingly, no orders are required to be passed further or revision of the salary of the petitioner in comparative to that of the respondent. It goes without saying that the petitioner would be treated to draw higher salary than that of the respondent for all time.