REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

NARINDER MOHAN SHARMA Appellant

V/S

STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

AMARJEET KAUR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
M.R. PURUSHOTHAM VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
KHALEEL AHMED VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
C. SUKUMARAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
V VENKATA SUBBARAO VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
A SUBAIR VS. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. DNYANESHWAR LAXMAN RAO WANKHEDE [REFERRED TO]
B. JAYARAJ VS. STATE OF A.P. [REFERRED TO]
B. JAYARAJ VS. STATE OF A.P. [REFERRED TO]
M.R. PURUSHOTHAM VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
P. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY VS. THE DIST. INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
V. SEJAPPA VS. THE STATE BY POLICE INSPECTOR LOKAYUKTA, CHITRADURGA [REFERRED TO]
P K VERMA VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These two criminal appeals arise out of a common judgment, therefore, are heard together and disposed of by this unison judgment.

(2.) By way of impugned judgment dated 25.02.2016, the learned Sessions Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), Sriganganagar (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'learned trial Court') convicted the appellants for offence under Section 13(1)(d)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code (IPC) in Sessions Case No. 24/2010 and sentenced them as under :-

(3.) The police registered the FIR and investigation commenced. Upon completion of investigation, Anti Corruption Bureau, submitted charge-sheet against both the accused appellants before the court of Sessions Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, Sriganganagnar where charges of the case were framed. The accused appellants denied the charges. Upon denial to all the charges, the learned trial Court put them on trial.

Click here to view full judgment.

NARINDER MOHAN SHARMA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address