LAWS(RAJ)-2019-4-13

KAILASH JAIN Vs. MANOJ EQUIPMENT PVT. LTD

Decided On April 02, 2019
Kailash Jain Appellant
V/S
Manoj Equipment Pvt. Ltd Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The instant criminal misc. Petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the Petitioner against the order of learned Metropolitan Magistrate No.9, Jodhpur Metropolitan dated 04.2.2019 whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 311 Cr.P.C has been rejected.

(2.) Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants to prove the original copies of the documents mentioned in the application and it can be proved by calling the representative/partner of the company before the court. Earlier also, the petitioner had filed an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. before the trial court and same was dismissed against which the petitioner filed S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1622/2018 which was decided by this Court on 18.09.218 with following observations:-

(3.) Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent opposed the misc. petition and argued that petitioner has been purposely delaying completion of trial. The matter is pending since 2011 and this application under Section 311 Cr.P.C has been submitted by the petitioner in the year 2017. In the order passed by the trial court, it has been clearly mentioned that on 16.05.2017, the counsel for the petitioner completed the cross-examination while reserving the cross-examination for documents. Later on, cross- examination was concluded. Thereafter, the statement of accused was recorded on 31.08.2017 and matter was fixed for defence evidence on 11.09.2017 and on that day, petitioner filed the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. The said application was decided on 17.1.2018 and matter was fixed for defence evidence but no defence evidence was produced upto 05.07.2018 and on that day, the defence evidence was closed and matter was fixed for final arguments. In these circumstances, the trial Court was justified in rejecting the application filed by the petitioner and therefore, the misc petition may be dismissed.