(1.) THE petitioners have challenged the order dated 6.1.2005 where by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kota has dismissed the application for restoration filed by the petitioners.
(2.) IN a nutshell, the facts of the case are that the petitioner No. 1, Kamlawati Maisy lost her husband in a vehicular accident in the night of 31.12.1987. Since the petitioner and her son (petitioner No. 2) were dependent on the deceased, they filed a claim petition before Tribunal. Fourteen opportunities were given to the petitioners to produce their witness and evidence before the court. However, despite a number of opportunities being given, petitioners did not produce any witness or evidence before the Tribunal. Therefore, vide order dated 5.12.1997, the claim petition was dismissed. Subsequently, on 20.12.1997, a restoration application was filed. However, vide order dated 6.1.2005, the said application was also dismissed by the learned Tribunal. Hence, this petition before this court.