SHYAM LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) SINCE in both the matters controversy involved are similar, therefore, both the writ petitions are decided by this common judgment.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioners submitted that it was total unfair on the part of the respondents in awarding such a low marks in the interview to the petitioners when they secured very good marks in the written test as well as in the physical fitness test. It is also submitted that the post in question is the post of Constable and looking to the post, the petitioners' candidature could not have been rejected merely because of the low marking in the interview.