MAMTA SHARMA Vs. J P CHANDELIYA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) The petitioner has preferred this contempt petition for disobedience of the order of this Court dated 8th December, 2006 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1242/1997. The order dated 8th December, 2006 passed by this Court, reads thus -

(3.) The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has annexed a copy of list of selected candidates prepared in pursuance of the Advertisement No. 1/96 as Annexure-2 with the contempt petition, which clearly shows that the candidates shown at Serial No. 79 to 82 therein have not joined the posts, therefore, four posts were vacant and, as such, the respondents committed a contempt of the order of this Court by not giving appointment to the petitioner. A notice to show cause was given to the respondents and, in response thereto, a reply to the contempt petition has been filed wherein it has been mentioned that vacant posts of that year remained vacant up-to the end of the session and thereafter the said posts were merged in the vacancies for the next year and are to be advertised with the new posts of next year. At present no post of Teacher Gr.III is lying vacant pursuant to the Advertisement No. 1/96.