(1.) TO challenge correctness of the judgment dt. 11.05.2000 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2251/1998, this special appeal is preferred.
(2.) THE facts necessary to be noticed are that:
(3.) AS per counsel for the appellant, the appellant submitted an application seeking appointment for her son as early as possible and this fact itself proves harness suffered by her warranting employment on compassionate grounds. It is asserted that either the respondents should have kept candidature of the appellant 's son alive for appointment under the Rules of 1996 till attaining majority by him or a relaxation should have been granted in minimum age for appointment to the post of Lower Division Clerk by exercising powers under Rule 35 of the Rules of 1957.